This page provides guidance on how to design assignments in a group setting.
Group assessment measures individual achievement of learning outcomes within a group setting, either face-to-face or online. It can take different forms:
- Individual work combined into a group product
- Group collaboration with individual outputs
- Group collaboration with a single shared product
Group assessment is different from group work. Use it only when the learning outcomes require skills like teamwork, communication, or collaborative project work. The Academic Centre recommends avoiding group assessment unless required in the Programme Approval Document (PAD), as it is complex to design and mark.
Designing Group Assessments
Group assessments must:
- Match the course level and learning outcomes
- Enable collaboration while allowing individual contributions
- Provide fair, valid, transparent and consistent assessment
- Include a structure that clearly shows what each student is responsible for
Use tools like Canvas, Microsoft Teams, or discussion forums to track and record contributions. Mark allocation should reflect learning outcomes, not just group effort.
Quality Assurance
Moderate group assessments carefully. They must:
- Fit the course’s overall assessment plan
- Align with good practice and compliance standards
- Be clearly approved in the PAD
- Ensure individual students are not disadvantaged by group dynamics
Assessment Structure and Evidence
Clearly explain:
- Why group assessment is being used
- Conditions, instructions, and roles for group members
- How each student will be individually assessed
Each student must provide evidence of their contribution. Examples of acceptable evidence include:
- Group presentation videos
- Individual reflection or self-assessment
- Group meeting notes or minutes
- Assessor notes from observations or interviews
- Individual contribution forms
Use a rubric to communicate assessment criteria.
Potential Issues in Group Assessment Design
- Each student must meet all learning outcomes (LOs): You cannot split LOs between students. Every student must show evidence of achieving every LO.
- Mark individual contributions: Do not let one student’s lack of input unfairly affect the group mark. Even if a group produces a shared final product, each student must be assessed on what they personally contributed.
- Check weight and group size: A 30% group assessment with 3 students is not the same as a 60% group assessment with 5 students. Larger groups and higher weightings require more time, depth, and complexity.
- Avoid single group marks: A shared mark for all group members does not prove that each student achieved the learning outcomes.
- Support for ineffective groups: Include clear guidance in the assessment instructions explaining how individual contributions will be measured if the group does not function well.
- Evidence matters: Presentations or group write-ups are not enough. You need clear evidence of:
- Individual contributions
- Group planning and discussion
- Teamwork and communication
- Use tools like meeting minutes, contribution forms, observation notes, or interviews.
Hints and Tips
- Think carefully about the assessment itself first. How is the group going to be able to show that collectively and individually they have met all Learning Outcomes?
- If you can avoid doing group assessment, avoid doing group assessment. Group assessment is not group work.
- Support your groups. Check-in on them at various milestones in their project. Intervene if there are students who are not pulling their weight
- Think carefully about group composition.
- Mark group assessment using SpeedGrader where possible. You can then go back and add marks for individual contribution.